Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

in pari delicto

Read a random definition: writ of protection

A quick definition of in pari delicto:

In pari delicto: A fancy Latin phrase that means "in equal fault." It's used in law to say that if someone did something wrong and is trying to sue someone else for damages, they might not be able to get any money because they were also at fault. This is called an equitable defense. If both parties are equally responsible for doing something wrong, they can't get help from each other to pay for damages. However, if one party is more responsible than the other, they might be able to get some help paying for damages.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: In pari delicto is a Latin phrase used in tort and contract law that means "in equal fault." It is a doctrine that states that a plaintiff cannot recover damages for a wrong they participated in and serves as an equitable defense. Courts are hesitant to award relief to plaintiffs who have unclean hands.

For example, if two people agree to commit a crime together and one of them gets injured during the crime, they cannot sue the other person for damages because they were both equally at fault.

If the parties in a lawsuit are found liable in pari delicto as joint tortfeasors, the potential remedies available to them are limited. Since both parties were equally responsible for committing a tort, indemnity is not available to them as a remedy. However, each party may seek contribution from the other, or if an involved party is vicariously liable for another and must pay more than their proportional share, they may seek contribution from that other party.

For example, if two companies collude to fix prices and are sued by customers for overcharging, they cannot seek indemnification from each other because they were both equally at fault. However, they can seek contribution from each other to pay for the damages awarded to the customers.

It is important to note that joint tortfeasors who are not in pari delicto may generally be entitled to indemnification from the other party. Also, if the tortfeasors in either scenario violated some equitable norm, then the clean-hands doctrine may further restrict the award of any equitable remedies.

in loco parentis | in perpetuity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
13:30
@HowlEngineer: I'll get more specific once I get my LSAT score, but NYU, Berk, GTown, UCLA
13:30
Anywhere that's top for PI
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.