Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

In re Gault (1967)

Read a random definition: nominal capital

A quick definition of In re Gault (1967):

In re Gault (1967) is a court case that says kids who are accused of breaking the law have the right to be treated fairly. This means they have the right to know what they are being accused of, to have a lawyer to help them, and to not be forced to say anything that could get them in trouble. The court said that these rights are important because they help protect our freedom.

A more thorough explanation:

In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established that juvenile criminal defendants have the right to Due Process protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The Court ruled that due process of law is the foundation of individual freedom and that juvenile defendants are entitled to the same legal protections as adult defendants. This includes the right to:

  • Timely notice of criminal charges
  • Confront and cross-examine witnesses
  • Not testify against oneself
  • Representation by a lawyer

For example, if a 16-year-old is accused of a crime, they have the right to know exactly what they are being accused of and to have a lawyer represent them in court. They also have the right to question any witnesses who testify against them.

The Court also held that written notice of the charges must be given to the child and their parents or guardian "at the earliest practicable time, and in any event sufficiently in advance of hearing to permit preparation." This means that the child and their family must be informed of the charges against them in writing and given enough time to prepare a defense.

Overall, the In re Gault case was a significant step forward in protecting the rights of juvenile defendants and ensuring that they receive fair treatment under the law.

in propria persona | in re

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
therapist slander detected
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Anyone got any polymarket locks
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Is anyone in here cool like fr cool
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Like watch college football cool
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Or like
1a2b3c4d26z
20:38
Frat
1a2b3c4d26z
20:39
Sorry guys I'm bored trying to get my Berkeley essay to 4 pages
20:40
no way they want four pages that’s crazy
20:41
bitches wanna be different sooo bad 😴
1a2b3c4d26z
20:42
Technically they want 3 to be completely fair to the powers that be, so I'm really trying to push out to 3
1a2b3c4d26z
20:42
But it's 1/2 inch margins
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.