Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

in terrorem clause

Read a random definition: nuncupare

A quick definition of in terrorem clause:

An in terrorem clause is a rule in a will that says if someone tries to challenge the will, they won't get what they were supposed to receive. This is meant to scare people from contesting the will by offering them a reward if they don't. However, in some places, this rule doesn't work if there's a good reason to challenge the will.

A more thorough explanation:

An in terrorem clause is a part of a will that says if someone challenges the will, they won't get what they were supposed to receive. This means that the person who challenges the will risks losing their inheritance. The purpose of this clause is to discourage people from challenging the will. However, in some states, this clause is not enforceable if there is a good reason to challenge the will.

Let's say that John's father passed away and left him a large sum of money in his will. However, John's sister believes that the will is not valid and decides to challenge it. If the will has an in terrorem clause, it means that if John's sister loses the challenge, she will not receive anything from the will. This is meant to discourage her from challenging the will in the first place.

Another example could be if a person leaves their estate to a charity, but their family members believe that they should have received a portion of the estate. If the will has an in terrorem clause, it means that if the family members challenge the will and lose, they will not receive anything from the estate.

These examples illustrate how an in terrorem clause can be used to discourage people from challenging a will. It is important to note that this clause is not always enforceable and can be challenged if there is a good reason to do so.

in rem | in toto

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
How'd you feel about your test
10:01
good morning y'all
Morning
10:37
Gecko, I feel pretty good. Two of the RC passages had really tough inference questions -- hoping I narrowed down my answer choices correctly
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.