Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

indefeasibly vested remainder

Read a random definition: postnuptial will

A quick definition of indefeasibly vested remainder:

An indefeasibly vested remainder is a type of future interest in property that goes to someone other than the person who created the estate or their heirs. It happens after the current estate ends. For example, if a grant is "to A for life, and then to B," B's future interest is a remainder. If there is only one preceding estate and the remainder vests on that estate's expiration, the remainder is also termed an executed estate. It is a type of vested remainder that is not subject to a condition subsequent, meaning the person who will receive the property is certain to acquire it in the future and will be entitled to keep it permanently.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An indefeasibly vested remainder is a future interest in a third person, who is intended to take after the natural termination of the preceding estate. It is a type of remainder that is not subject to any condition subsequent and is certain to acquire a present interest sometime in the future.

Example: If a grant is “to A for life, and then to B,” B's future interest is an indefeasibly vested remainder. This means that B is certain to acquire the property after A's death, and there are no conditions that could prevent B from taking possession of the property.

Explanation: An indefeasibly vested remainder is a type of remainder that is not subject to any condition subsequent. This means that the remainderman is certain to acquire a present interest sometime in the future and will be entitled to retain the interest permanently. In the example given, B's interest in the property is certain and cannot be taken away by any condition subsequent. B will acquire the property after A's death, and there are no conditions that could prevent B from taking possession of the property.

indecimable | indefensus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.