Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

indefeasibly vested remainder

Read a random definition: aid prayer

A quick definition of indefeasibly vested remainder:

An indefeasibly vested remainder is a type of future interest in property that goes to someone other than the person who created the estate or their heirs. It happens after the current estate ends. For example, if a grant is "to A for life, and then to B," B's future interest is a remainder. If there is only one preceding estate and the remainder vests on that estate's expiration, the remainder is also termed an executed estate. It is a type of vested remainder that is not subject to a condition subsequent, meaning the person who will receive the property is certain to acquire it in the future and will be entitled to keep it permanently.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An indefeasibly vested remainder is a future interest in a third person, who is intended to take after the natural termination of the preceding estate. It is a type of remainder that is not subject to any condition subsequent and is certain to acquire a present interest sometime in the future.

Example: If a grant is “to A for life, and then to B,” B's future interest is an indefeasibly vested remainder. This means that B is certain to acquire the property after A's death, and there are no conditions that could prevent B from taking possession of the property.

Explanation: An indefeasibly vested remainder is a type of remainder that is not subject to any condition subsequent. This means that the remainderman is certain to acquire a present interest sometime in the future and will be entitled to retain the interest permanently. In the example given, B's interest in the property is certain and cannot be taken away by any condition subsequent. B will acquire the property after A's death, and there are no conditions that could prevent B from taking possession of the property.

indecimable | indefensus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:47
to apply it. I love it- looking like a 155-170+ in a few months for me
oh i just checked, i still have to pay even if i have a fee waiver, damn
14:48
imo go basic with FW, then when (if) you run out of questions/tests, upgrade OR just take tests /drill on lawhib
14:48
the long sleep
ill give a free edition a try first, if i like then i will purchase. they have 3 free tests, right?
14:50
oh yea obi go free- yes 3 free tests. yes they can be crude/'mean' but they explain all 5 answers and when u upgrade they have good write ups on ea question
ill start prepping in january and aim for august lsat or september even. would it look bad if i have 3-4 attempts on my record? I already took it twice and cancelled my first score so im bit worried about that lol
nope lots of people take the lsat 3-4 times
14:59
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: is it bad: some schools seem to prefer 1 and done vs 2+ takes. Is it better for you? If score much higher- yes. Overall, if it makes sense for u go for it
you might have to write an addendum though, but schools really want higher medians so if they see a big number that's all they honestly care about
14:59
^^^
CLS is my dream school and the only reason I am considering reapplying is to probably score higher and have better chances there, so fingers crossed they're chill about it
15:05
with that targeted goal/ willingness to take a year to improve score, and from what you have said, it seems like a great option to reapply early next cycle w/ a higher score. best of luck!
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
more likely than not you make it into at least one t14
15:14
Hey long time no see hahaha, the prob with that is it has the range of up to 172, Im only 170
15:14
If u have the top range at my stats, there's only like 9 ppl who made it into T14s
yeah but it's also including people below your stats
15:15
Yeah, really my issue is deciding whether to R&R or to just take UF law
also if you reduce the top end of lsat to 170, you have a 33% chance at NYU+columbia, 67% at NU, 33 at mich, 40% berk, 40% UCLA, 100% Cornell, and 50% gulc
realistically you would make it into at least one
15:16
I'm still waiting on a bunch of T14 so hopefully those stats are a good indicator
15:16
idk wait it out - if good offer take if no good offer R&R
i dont think you need to R&R im pretty sure you make it into at least one t14
but if you apply earlier its just a lot easier
15:17
thats odd I didn't see those stats, but ok. We talked abt this awhile back and I'm working on Columbia + Berkeley rn then Cornell, probs is I'm not gonna produce good Why X's before the 25th but whatever
https://www.lsd.law/search/cV9E6 this is artificially deflated because it's only below your stats
someone got into harvard and chicago with your stats
15:19
Why is that deflating it? isnt that a better indicator instead of choosing above median LSATs? Genuinely curious just wondering
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.