Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

indorsee

Read a random definition: equitable estoppel

A quick definition of indorsee:

Indorsee: A person who receives a piece of paper that can be exchanged for money or goods by someone else. This person gets the paper because someone else wrote their name on it and gave it to them. If the indorsee gets the paper in a normal way, without knowing that it's not worth anything, they can use it to get money or goods.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An indorsee (also spelled endorsee) is a person who receives a negotiable instrument through endorsement. This means that the instrument, such as a check or promissory note, has been signed over to them by the original payee or holder.

An indorsee can be anyone who is legally allowed to receive and hold a negotiable instrument, such as an individual, a business, or a financial institution.

There are different types of indorsees, but one important category is the "indorsee in due course." This refers to an indorsee who acquires a negotiable instrument in good faith, for value, and without knowledge of any defects or issues with the instrument.

For example, if a person receives a check from a friend and then endorses it over to their bank, the bank becomes the indorsee. If the bank received the check in good faith, before its maturity date, and without any knowledge of any problems with the check, then it would be considered an indorsee in due course.

Another example could be a business that receives a promissory note from a customer and then endorses it over to a factoring company. The factoring company becomes the indorsee and can collect the payment from the customer when the note matures. If the factoring company acquired the note in good faith, for value, and without any knowledge of any issues with the note, then it would be considered an indorsee in due course.

These examples illustrate how an indorsee is someone who receives a negotiable instrument through endorsement, and how an indorsee in due course is someone who acquires the instrument in good faith, for value, and without knowledge of any defects or issues.

indivisum | indorser

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
no i think there should be a Law School combine with all new drills except there is still the 40 yard dash
and a sub 4.5 gets you into any t14
LSAT can be one of the drills
letsseehowitgoesnow
11:17
so washu only called one person
So all the D1 athletes will get into a T-14. What else is new?
@TheAdoptedOne: that is called "Dean Poker Night" lol
@ClockworkBlue: I feel like most people could train for the 40 for the same amount of time as they do the LSAT and get close to sub 5 which would be equivalent to a 167+
this is like the schizophrenic posts JJK tik tok be putting out
powerscaling Law School deans up next
11:19
Election Day election day
Write in Dean Z vote
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.