Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inevitable-accident doctrine

Read a random definition: without prejudice

A quick definition of inevitable-accident doctrine:

The inevitable-accident doctrine is a rule in tort law that says no one is responsible for an accident that was not foreseeable and could not have been prevented even with reasonable care. However, many courts now prefer to focus on the concepts of duty, negligence, and proximate cause instead of relying on this doctrine.

A more thorough explanation:

The inevitable-accident doctrine, also known as the unavoidable-accident doctrine, is a legal rule that states that no party can be held liable for an accident that was not foreseeable and could not have been prevented by exercising reasonable care.

For example, if a driver is driving on a road and suddenly a tree falls on their car, causing an accident, the driver cannot be held liable for the accident because it was not foreseeable and could not have been prevented by the driver's reasonable care.

However, the modern trend is for courts to ignore this doctrine and instead rely on the basic concepts of duty, negligence, and proximate cause to determine liability in accidents.

Overall, the inevitable-accident doctrine is a legal principle that protects parties from liability in accidents that were truly unavoidable and unforeseeable.

inevitable accident | inevitable-disclosure doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:04
time to harass glove on linkedin
lilypadfrog
14:06
that’s a good way to stay awake. tell him to come back here
14:08
lily i broke a rubber band already
14:08
le sigh
lilypadfrog
14:08
damn you get vicious with it. just pinch yourself or something
lilypadfrog
14:09
don’t break your finger
14:13
its a bum-ass law school but LSD really needs to update UCLawSF's name
14:13
whose manager can I call about that
lilypadfrog
14:14
I think the people in charge don’t come on here anymore but you can email them if you really care like that
14:14
yeah true that. Although I prefer Hastings just because it is easy to differentiate from U of SF
renard99
14:14
There's a lot on this site that doesn't work and for maybe $5k I'd be more than willing to fix it
14:14
send bid proposal Renard
renard99
14:14
But as Lilypad said it's probably just maintained atp, no major updates
14:15
fwiw all the UCLSF students I know still basically say hastings. even the huge crest in the foyer still says hastings
renard99
14:15
@llama: Man I'd be more than happy to
14:15
LSD is in decay age of social network
renard99
14:15
^LMAO yeah
renard99
14:15
Basically accepted atp that I'm gonna have to R&R so might as well take up some jobs while I'm at it
14:15
sad. imagine being here in 2005/2010 when it was 100 operational. woe is me
@llama: back when 160s meant t14
14:16
born too late to experience full LSD born too soon to explore the galaxy
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.