Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

reasonable care

Read a random definition: call of a meeting

A quick definition of reasonable care:

Reasonable care means taking the same amount of care that a normal, careful person would take in the same situation. If someone doesn't take reasonable care and someone else gets hurt, they might be responsible for the injury. But if someone does take reasonable care, they won't be responsible for the injury. For example, if someone installs water pipes that can handle freezing temperatures, they're taking reasonable care. If the pipes still burst during an unusually cold winter, they won't be responsible for the damage.

A more thorough explanation:

Reasonable Care

Reasonable care is the level of care that a normal person would take in a given situation. If someone fails to take reasonable care and someone gets hurt, they may be held responsible. On the other hand, if someone takes reasonable care, they can show that they acted responsibly and are not responsible for any harm caused. For example, in the case of Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co. in 1856, the court found that the pipelayers had taken reasonable care when their pipes burst due to an unusually cold winter. They had installed the pipes to withstand freezing conditions that were normal for that city.

Imagine you are driving a car. Taking reasonable care means following traffic laws, driving at a safe speed, and paying attention to the road. If you fail to take reasonable care and cause an accident, you may be held responsible for any harm caused. However, if you take reasonable care and someone else causes an accident, you are not responsible for any harm caused.

Reasonable belief | Reasonable doubt

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.