Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

informational picketing

Read a random definition: unlawful detainer

A quick definition of informational picketing:

Informational picketing is when a group of people stand outside a building or workplace to share information about a problem or issue they have with that place. They might hold signs or hand out flyers to let others know what they think is wrong and why they want things to change. It's a way for people to peacefully express their opinions and try to make a difference.

A more thorough explanation:

INFORMATIONAL PICKETING

Informational picketing is a type of protest where people gather outside a workplace or business to inform the public about a particular issue or cause. Unlike traditional picketing, informational picketing is not meant to disrupt the business or prevent people from entering or leaving the premises.

For example, a group of animal rights activists might conduct informational picketing outside a restaurant that serves foie gras to raise awareness about the inhumane treatment of ducks and geese. They might hold signs and distribute flyers to educate the public about the issue.

Another example could be a group of workers who are on strike to protest unfair labor practices by their employer. They might conduct informational picketing outside the company's headquarters to inform the public about their grievances and gain support for their cause.

Informational picketing is a peaceful way to raise awareness about a particular issue or cause. It allows people to express their views and educate the public without disrupting the normal operations of a business or workplace. The examples illustrate how different groups can use informational picketing to draw attention to their concerns and gain support for their cause.

informational member | informational privacy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.