Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

injunction

Read a random definition: bridge the gap

A quick definition of injunction:

An injunction is a special order from a court that tells someone to either do something or stop doing something. There are three types of injunctions: temporary, preliminary, and permanent. Temporary injunctions are like a quick fix and can be given without a court hearing, but they only last for a short time. Preliminary injunctions are a bit more serious and require a court hearing and notice to the other party. Permanent injunctions are the most serious and are given as a final decision in a case. If someone doesn't follow an injunction, they can get in trouble with the court.

A more thorough explanation:

An injunction is a court order that requires a person to either do or stop doing a specific action. There are three types of injunctions: permanent, temporary restraining orders, and preliminary injunctions.

A TRO is a short-term measure that can be issued by a federal court without notice to the opposing party. It is in effect until the court can issue something more enduring, such as a preliminary injunction. For example, a TRO can be issued to prevent contact between parties where the defendant's actions could seriously harm the plaintiff.

A preliminary injunction is slightly more enduring than a TRO and requires a court proceeding and usually requires notice to the opposing party. In determining whether to grant or deny a preliminary injunction, the court generally looks at several factors, including the plaintiff's likelihood of prevailing on the merits, a showing of irreparable injury to the plaintiff if relief is not granted, and the balancing of equities.

A permanent injunction is issued as a final judgment in a case where monetary damages will not suffice. To seek a permanent injunction, the plaintiff must pass a four-step test, including showing that the plaintiff has suffered an irreparable injury, that remedies available at law are inadequate to compensate for the injury, that the remedy in equity is warranted upon consideration of the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, and that the permanent injunction being sought would not hurt public interest.

In 1973, the Supreme Court issued a permanent injunction in the case of Roe v. Wade, which prevented states from banning abortions. This is an example of a permanent injunction because monetary damages would not suffice to protect the plaintiff's rights.

Another example of an injunction is a TRO issued by a federal court in 1981 against the Los Angeles Unified School District to stop the district's plans to dismantle an organized busing plan, fearing that the school district's plans would harm the students.

These examples illustrate how injunctions can be used to protect individuals' rights and prevent harm from occurring.

initial public offering (IPO) | injunctive relief

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.