Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

injunction

Read a random definition: matrimonial action

A quick definition of injunction:

An injunction is a special order from a court that tells someone to either do something or stop doing something. There are three types of injunctions: temporary, preliminary, and permanent. Temporary injunctions are like a quick fix and can be given without a court hearing, but they only last for a short time. Preliminary injunctions are a bit more serious and require a court hearing and notice to the other party. Permanent injunctions are the most serious and are given as a final decision in a case. If someone doesn't follow an injunction, they can get in trouble with the court.

A more thorough explanation:

An injunction is a court order that requires a person to either do or stop doing a specific action. There are three types of injunctions: permanent, temporary restraining orders, and preliminary injunctions.

A TRO is a short-term measure that can be issued by a federal court without notice to the opposing party. It is in effect until the court can issue something more enduring, such as a preliminary injunction. For example, a TRO can be issued to prevent contact between parties where the defendant's actions could seriously harm the plaintiff.

A preliminary injunction is slightly more enduring than a TRO and requires a court proceeding and usually requires notice to the opposing party. In determining whether to grant or deny a preliminary injunction, the court generally looks at several factors, including the plaintiff's likelihood of prevailing on the merits, a showing of irreparable injury to the plaintiff if relief is not granted, and the balancing of equities.

A permanent injunction is issued as a final judgment in a case where monetary damages will not suffice. To seek a permanent injunction, the plaintiff must pass a four-step test, including showing that the plaintiff has suffered an irreparable injury, that remedies available at law are inadequate to compensate for the injury, that the remedy in equity is warranted upon consideration of the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, and that the permanent injunction being sought would not hurt public interest.

In 1973, the Supreme Court issued a permanent injunction in the case of Roe v. Wade, which prevented states from banning abortions. This is an example of a permanent injunction because monetary damages would not suffice to protect the plaintiff's rights.

Another example of an injunction is a TRO issued by a federal court in 1981 against the Los Angeles Unified School District to stop the district's plans to dismantle an organized busing plan, fearing that the school district's plans would harm the students.

These examples illustrate how injunctions can be used to protect individuals' rights and prevent harm from occurring.

initial public offering (IPO) | injunctive relief

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
15:23
what if I started flexing again
15:24
that might be too much
15:33
can we see ur mod badge?
15:41
just for u sweetie pie
15:43
woah so much swagger with dat 'm;
Dkk
15:47
@shaquilleoatmeal: more like, blow my back out by the bay boston instead of back bay boston.
Dkk
15:48
Indeed, the legendary man himself.
15:49
I would go to blow my back out by the bay boston
15:50
lift with ur back not your legs, its better to have a blown back than two bad legs
CynicalOops
15:53
Blow and back day out by boston bay
15:59
so true
Dkk
16:03
Of course. Man sad Ricky Henderson died. That was my favorite athlete of all time.
windyMagician
16:10
is it dumb that I rlly want to go to Mich even tho I have a full ride to umn
16:12
no-value as a consumer often means more than the price
Dkk
16:15
@windyMagician: Nah michigan is better than UMN
Dkk
16:15
My sister just officially graduated, yay!
16:16
awesome @Dkks sister
16:16
prolly named veronica or sarah
windyMagician
16:16
@Dkk: for public defense tho?
windyMagician
16:16
Sarah in the bathroom
texaslawhopefully
16:17
@windyMagician: not at all. Michigan is also very generous with aid, so if you get enough it makes perfect sense to take it.
windyMagician
16:17
fuck okay
windyMagician
16:17
going to my dream school is crazy
michigan also has better options if you do PD for 10 years then want to do something else
windyMagician
16:19
also would love to clerk for my federal district court even tho I know its hella competitive, I think mich sets me up better?
16:20
would be a great point to bring up when ur deciding / visiting each place- see what recent placement looks like
texaslawhopefully
16:23
For fed clerkships by far Michigan places better. I think it’s like 14-15 percent
windyMagician
16:25
sticker debt is high-key scary tho
texaslawhopefully
16:26
I’m sure you’ll get good merit aid though. Look at Michigan’s 509 report. They’re very generous.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.