A lawyer is a person who writes a 10,000-word document and calls it a 'brief'.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - innocent misrepresentation

LSDefine

Definition of innocent misrepresentation

Innocent misrepresentation occurs when one person makes a false statement of fact to another, and that statement influences the other person to enter into an agreement or make a decision. The key characteristic is that the person making the false statement genuinely believed it to be true at the time it was made, and had no intention to deceive or mislead. They were not negligent or careless in making the statement; they simply had incorrect information.

Here are some examples to illustrate this concept:

  • Example 1: Used Car Sale

    Sarah is selling her used car. In her online advertisement, she states, "The car has brand new brake pads installed last month." She genuinely believes this because her mechanic told her he replaced them during the last service. However, the mechanic actually only replaced the front brake pads and resurfaced the rear ones, but Sarah misunderstood or misremembered. A buyer, Mark, sees the ad, is reassured by the "brand new brake pads," and purchases the car. Later, Mark discovers the rear brake pads are old and worn.

    How it illustrates: Sarah made a false statement about the brake pads. She genuinely believed her statement was true and had no intention to deceive Mark. Mark was influenced by this statement to buy the car. This is an innocent misrepresentation because Sarah's belief was honest, even if factually mistaken.

  • Example 2: Apartment Rental

    A landlord, David, is showing an apartment to a prospective tenant, Emily. David tells Emily, "The building has a fully equipped gym available for all residents." David genuinely believes this because the previous building manager had informed him of it, and he hadn't personally checked the gym in several months. In reality, the gym equipment was removed for renovations two weeks prior, and the room is now empty. Emily, who specifically wanted a building with a gym, signs the lease based on David's statement.

    How it illustrates: David made a false statement about the gym's availability. He genuinely believed it was true based on outdated information and had no intent to mislead Emily. Emily relied on this statement when deciding to rent the apartment. This is an innocent misrepresentation because David's belief was sincere, though incorrect.

  • Example 3: Collectible Item Sale

    An antique dealer, Mr. Henderson, sells a vintage pocket watch to a collector, Ms. Chen. Mr. Henderson describes the watch as "a rare 1930s Swiss timepiece with an original movement," based on documentation provided by the previous owner and his own assessment, which he believed to be accurate. Ms. Chen, relying on this description, purchases the watch for a significant sum. Later, an independent expert examines the watch and determines that while the casing is from the 1930s, the movement was replaced in the 1960s with a non-original part, significantly reducing its value. Mr. Henderson had no practical way of knowing this without specialized equipment and genuinely believed his description was correct.

    How it illustrates: Mr. Henderson made a false statement about the watch's originality. He genuinely believed his description was accurate based on the information he had and his expertise, and he had no intention to deceive Ms. Chen. Ms. Chen was induced to buy the watch by this statement. This is an innocent misrepresentation because Mr. Henderson's belief was honest and reasonable given the information available to him, even though it turned out to be factually incorrect.

Simple Definition

Innocent misrepresentation occurs when a person makes a false statement of fact that induces another party into a contract, but the person making the statement genuinely believed it to be true and had no intention to deceive. Despite the lack of fraudulent intent, such a misrepresentation can still lead to legal remedies, often allowing the misled party to rescind the contract.