Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

innocent spouse rule

Read a random definition: quia

A quick definition of innocent spouse rule:

The innocent spouse rule is a way for someone to get relief from having to pay taxes, interest, and penalties that resulted from their current or former spouse reporting wrong information on their joint tax return. If the innocent spouse didn't know about the wrong information and it wouldn't be fair to make them pay for it, they can apply for relief. They have to fill out a form and meet certain requirements, like not participating in any fraud. The rule is meant to help people who were unaware of their spouse's mistakes on their tax return.

A more thorough explanation:

The innocent spouse rule is a type of relief offered by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to individuals who filed a joint tax return with their current or former spouse and are seeking relief from joint and several liability for tax, interest, and penalties resulting from erroneous items reported by their spouse on the joint return.

Erroneous items can include unreported gross income, incorrect deductions, credits, or property basis claimed by the spouse. The innocent spouse rule provides total or partial relief to the applicant if they had no knowledge or reason to know of the erroneous item.

For example, if a husband and wife file a joint tax return and the husband fails to report income from a side job, the wife may be eligible for relief under the innocent spouse rule if she had no knowledge of the unreported income and did not benefit from it.

To qualify for relief, the applicant must meet three requirements:

  1. The joint return has an understatement of tax due to erroneous items reported by the spouse.
  2. The applicant did not know and had no reason to know of the understatement of tax at the time of signing the joint return.
  3. It would be unfair to hold the applicant liable for the spouse's understatement of tax given the facts and circumstances of their situation.

Additionally, the applicant and their spouse must not have participated in a fraudulent transfer of property. If the applicant meets the requirements, they must file Form 8857 with the IRS within two years of the first attempt to collect the increased tax.

Overall, the innocent spouse rule provides relief to individuals who were unaware of their spouse's erroneous items on a joint tax return and should not be held liable for them.

innocent | innuendo

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:29
@LawIsForPeasants: hey.
Vandy gettin fat, that's what bandi did
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.