Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inter conjunctas personas

Read a random definition: Granger Cases

A quick definition of inter conjunctas personas:

Inter conjunctas personas: This is a Latin term that means "between conjunct persons." It refers to conveyances (transfers of property) between certain family members that were considered void if they were intended to defraud someone. In simpler terms, if family members tried to cheat someone by transferring property between themselves, the transfer would not be considered valid.

A more thorough explanation:

INTER CONJUNCTAS PERSONAS

Inter conjunctas personas is a Latin term that means "between conjunct persons." In history, conveyances between certain family members were considered void if they were designed to defraud.

An example of inter conjunctas personas would be if a father transferred ownership of his property to his son for a very low price, with the intention of avoiding creditors. This type of transfer would be considered fraudulent and would not be recognized by the law.

Another example would be if a husband transferred ownership of his property to his wife to avoid paying taxes. This type of transfer would also be considered fraudulent and would not be recognized by the law.

The examples illustrate how inter conjunctas personas was used to prevent fraudulent transfers of property between family members. The law recognized that such transfers could be used to avoid creditors or taxes, and therefore, they were considered void. This helped to ensure that property was transferred fairly and that creditors and the government were not cheated out of what they were owed.

inter conjuges | intercountry adoption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.