Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inter conjunctas personas

Read a random definition: referendarius

A quick definition of inter conjunctas personas:

Inter conjunctas personas: This is a Latin term that means "between conjunct persons." It refers to conveyances (transfers of property) between certain family members that were considered void if they were intended to defraud someone. In simpler terms, if family members tried to cheat someone by transferring property between themselves, the transfer would not be considered valid.

A more thorough explanation:

INTER CONJUNCTAS PERSONAS

Inter conjunctas personas is a Latin term that means "between conjunct persons." In history, conveyances between certain family members were considered void if they were designed to defraud.

An example of inter conjunctas personas would be if a father transferred ownership of his property to his son for a very low price, with the intention of avoiding creditors. This type of transfer would be considered fraudulent and would not be recognized by the law.

Another example would be if a husband transferred ownership of his property to his wife to avoid paying taxes. This type of transfer would also be considered fraudulent and would not be recognized by the law.

The examples illustrate how inter conjunctas personas was used to prevent fraudulent transfers of property between family members. The law recognized that such transfers could be used to avoid creditors or taxes, and therefore, they were considered void. This helped to ensure that property was transferred fairly and that creditors and the government were not cheated out of what they were owed.

inter conjuges | intercountry adoption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
i literally just need one A so i can relax before my ED decision
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:38
oh that's right USC might release
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.