Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inter partes reexamination

Read a random definition: real-estate mortgage trust

A quick definition of inter partes reexamination:

Inter partes reexamination is a process where someone can ask the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to review a patent to see if it's still valid. This can happen if someone thinks there is evidence that the patent shouldn't have been granted in the first place. Both the person who owns the patent and the person who is challenging it can participate in the review process. They can share documents and respond to each other's arguments, but they can't ask witnesses questions or do other things that happen in a trial. If the review finds that the patent shouldn't have been granted, it might be changed or cancelled.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Inter partes reexamination is a legal process in which the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reviews an already-issued patent to determine if it is valid based on prior art. This process can be initiated by anyone, including the patent holder or an anonymous informant, at any time during the life of the patent. Only patents and publications can be considered as prior art.

Example: A company is accused of infringing on a patent held by another company. The alleged infringer seeks inter partes reexamination of the patent to prove that it is invalid based on prior art. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reviews the patent and determines whether it is valid or not.

This example illustrates how inter partes reexamination can be used to challenge the validity of a patent and avoid liability for infringement.

inter partes | interpel

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.