Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

inter partes reexamination

Read a random definition: stripped mortgage-backed security

A quick definition of inter partes reexamination:

Inter partes reexamination is a process where someone can ask the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to review a patent to see if it's still valid. This can happen if someone thinks there is evidence that the patent shouldn't have been granted in the first place. Both the person who owns the patent and the person who is challenging it can participate in the review process. They can share documents and respond to each other's arguments, but they can't ask witnesses questions or do other things that happen in a trial. If the review finds that the patent shouldn't have been granted, it might be changed or cancelled.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Inter partes reexamination is a legal process in which the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reviews an already-issued patent to determine if it is valid based on prior art. This process can be initiated by anyone, including the patent holder or an anonymous informant, at any time during the life of the patent. Only patents and publications can be considered as prior art.

Example: A company is accused of infringing on a patent held by another company. The alleged infringer seeks inter partes reexamination of the patent to prove that it is invalid based on prior art. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reviews the patent and determines whether it is valid or not.

This example illustrates how inter partes reexamination can be used to challenge the validity of a patent and avoid liability for infringement.

inter partes | interpel

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.