Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

interference-estoppel rejection

Read a random definition: jury chancellor

A quick definition of interference-estoppel rejection:

Interference-estoppel rejection is when a patent claim is rejected because the applicant did not bring it into a previous interference contest where its priority could have been determined. This is just one type of rejection that can happen during the patent application process. Rejection means that the patent examiner has found a problem with the application or claim, and it cannot be granted until the problem is fixed. There are many different types of rejection, such as lack of novelty or clarity, and each one requires a different solution.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Interference-estoppel rejection is a type of rejection in patent law where a patent claim is rejected because the applicant failed to bring the claim into a previous interference contest in which its priority could have been determined.

Example: If an inventor files a patent application for a new invention, but fails to participate in an interference contest with another inventor who filed a similar patent application earlier, the patent examiner may issue an interference-estoppel rejection. This means that the inventor cannot claim priority over the earlier application and the patent claim will be rejected.

This type of rejection is meant to prevent inventors from filing multiple patent applications for the same invention and to encourage them to participate in interference contests to determine priority.

interferant | interference with a business relationship

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.