Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

International Monetary Fund

Read a random definition: degree of crime

A quick definition of International Monetary Fund:

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization that helps countries work together on money issues. It was started in 1947 to make sure countries trade fairly and grow together. The IMF made a rule that countries had to keep their money exchange rate in terms of the U.S. dollar and gold. This rule lasted until 1971 when the U.S. government changed it.

A more thorough explanation:

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) was established in July 1994 in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire and became operational on March 1, 1947. Its main purpose is to promote international monetary cooperation, facilitate balanced growth in international trade, and maintain exchange arrangements among its member countries.

One of the key functions of the IMF is to establish a Par Value system, where member countries agree to keep their exchange rates in terms of the U.S. dollar and the value of the dollar in terms of gold. This system, also known as the Bretton Woods system, was in place until 1971 when the U.S. government suspended the convertibility of the dollar and dollar reserves held by other governments into gold.

For example, if a country's currency is worth $1.50 USD, the IMF would ensure that the country maintains that exchange rate with the U.S. dollar. This helps to promote stability in international trade and investment.

The IMF also provides financial assistance to member countries experiencing economic difficulties, such as balance of payment problems or currency crises. This assistance can come in the form of loans or policy advice.

international law | International trade

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.