Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

interrogatory

Read a random definition: latrociny

A quick definition of interrogatory:

Interrogatory: In a legal case, an interrogatory is a list of questions that one party sends to another to get information. The other party has to answer the questions honestly and under oath. Lawyers can help their clients answer the questions, so the answers are usually very carefully written. There are rules about how many questions can be asked, and these rules are different in different places.

A more thorough explanation:

In a civil lawsuit, an interrogatory is a set of questions that one party sends to the other party as part of the discovery process. The recipient must answer the questions under oath and according to the case's schedule. Attorneys may help their clients answer interrogatories, so the responses tend to be more carefully crafted than answers to deposition questions. The number of questions included in an interrogatory is usually limited by court rule.

For example, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each party may only ask each other party 25 questions via interrogatory unless the court gives permission to ask more. Interrogatory rules vary by jurisdiction.

Here is an example of an interrogatory:

Question: Please describe in detail the events that led up to the car accident on June 1, 2021.

Answer: On June 1, 2021, I was driving my car on Main Street when another car ran a red light and collided with my vehicle. I had no time to react and was unable to avoid the accident.

This example illustrates how an interrogatory is used to gather information about a specific event or situation related to the lawsuit. The recipient of the interrogatory must provide a detailed and truthful response under oath.

interrogatories | interstate commerce

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.