Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

interspousal tort immunity

Read a random definition: civil injury

A quick definition of interspousal tort immunity:

Interspousal tort immunity is a rule that says one spouse cannot sue the other for harm caused by a tort, like negligence or assault. This means that if a husband accidentally injures his wife, she cannot sue him for damages. However, this rule has been abolished in many states because it can prevent victims from seeking justice and can perpetuate domestic violence.

A more thorough explanation:

Interspousal tort immunity is a legal doctrine that provides immunity to one spouse from being sued by the other spouse for personal injury. This means that if one spouse injures the other, the injured spouse cannot sue the other for damages. This immunity was abolished in most states by judicial opinion or statute.

For example, if a husband accidentally injures his wife while they are playing a sport, the wife cannot sue the husband for damages because of interspousal tort immunity.

interspousal immunity | interstate

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 11 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
jackfrost11770
16:50
But gtown is special lmfao
jackfrost11770
16:50
In a bad way
Law-Guy
16:51
Do you need camera on/mic on for those Lets Talk Cornell things? I kinda want to attend but I'm at work
jackfrost11770
16:51
I have no idea I've never been to one
jackfrost11770
16:51
Hence Idk what to expect even capacity wise
jackfrost11770
16:51
But I'm literally still 30 minutes from home and it's in 10 min so unless I join on my phone with no camera or mic then I cannot lmao
jackfrost11770
16:55
You know what if Cornell don't want me they don't me I'm not worrying myself over this
Law-Guy
16:57
There was a Vandy wave today?
GodsPlanUltimately
16:57
@jackfrost11770: What a excellent mindset. Cornell must have poor taste
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:58
1. Kansas 196. Cornell
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
16:58
nope cornell can be 2.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
16:58
cornell is incredibly based
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
16:58
our professors are sigmapilled goonmaxxers
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:59
i see, a quality education
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
https://case.edu/law/our-school/news/case-western-reserve-school-law-becomes-first-law-school-us-require-legal-ai-education-certification-all-first-year-law-students
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
Interesting folks.
jackfrost11770
17:00
Cornell put me on reserve after interview they are at least slightly unbased
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:01
@jackfrost11770: thats why they sit at 2
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
17:01
cornell is based but universal rule is adcoms are ghouls
texaslawhopefully
17:01
this is depressing lol: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/boilingfrogs/shock-and-awe/
Dkk
17:01
@GodsPlanUltimately smart of them
Dkk
17:02
How is it unpopular when he got the pop vote and the electoral college. Unreadable after the title.
SplitterusClitterus
17:02
Who’s hearing from uclaaa rnnnn
texaslawhopefully
17:03
Glad you're back dk lmao. If you read the actual article, it's that his day one EO's are wildly unpopular (for instance the majority of americans support birthright citizenship). He can have won the popular vote and still do unpopular stuff
texaslawhopefully
17:03
"Two recent polls found opposition to pardoning the J6ers at 57 and 59 percent, respectively, and that was before Americans understood that even the cop-beaters in the crowd that day would be let off scot-free."
NuttyTalentedEmu
17:04
I wonder if this chat has mods
llama
17:04
as most dictators who have come into power do, he appealed to the masses just to turn face once in power
SplitterusClitterus
17:04
Barely nutty
Dkk
17:04
@texas maybe so. Maybe so.
llama
17:04
we have been duped.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.