Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

intervene

Read a random definition: shelf offering

A quick definition of intervene:

Intervene: When someone who was not originally part of a lawsuit wants to join in because they have a personal interest in the outcome, they can file a motion to intervene. This person is called an intervenor. They can join the side of the person suing or the person being sued, or they can be against both. There are two types of intervention: one where the person has a right to join, and one where the court can allow them to join if it won't cause problems for the original parties.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: To become involved in a lawsuit as a third party who was not originally named in the case but has a personal interest in the outcome.

For example, if a company is being sued for polluting a river, a local environmental group may want to intervene in the case to make sure their interests are represented.

There are two types of intervention: intervention as of right and permissive intervention. Intervention as of right is when the third party has an unconditional right to enter the litigation based on a statute or when the third party may be bound by the outcome of the case without their interests being adequately represented. In permissive intervention, the court may permit a third party to intervene if the party’s claim shares a common question of law or fact with the existing case and it will not delay the lawsuit or prejudice the original parties’ rights.

Overall, intervention allows a third party to become involved in a lawsuit to protect their interests and ensure that their voice is heard in the legal process.

interstate commerce | intervening cause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.