Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

intrinsic fraud

Read a random definition: extortion

A quick definition of intrinsic fraud:

Intrinsic fraud: This is when someone in a court case has a chance to stop their opponent from lying, but they don't do anything about it. It's different from when someone lies on purpose to trick the court, which is called extrinsic fraud. Intrinsic fraud can't be used to change a previous decision. A good example is when someone lies under oath (called perjury) and the other person doesn't try to prove it's a lie. If the lie helps the person win the case, and they don't do anything about it, they can't complain later if they lose.

A more thorough explanation:

Intrinsic fraud is a type of fraud that occurs during litigation when one party has the opportunity to protect themselves from their opponent's fraud but fails to do so. It is not an affirmative misrepresentation, unlike extrinsic fraud.

For example, perjury is a classic example of intrinsic fraud. When a witness lies under oath, they know that their false testimony is the only way to support their claim or defense. The trial is their chance to prove the truth, but they choose to lie instead. If they fail to prove their case and the judgment is affirmed on appeal, they cannot use intrinsic fraud to challenge the decision.

Another example of intrinsic fraud is when a party fails to disclose important evidence that could have affected the outcome of the case. If they had the opportunity to present the evidence but chose not to, they cannot later claim intrinsic fraud to challenge the judgment.

Intrinsic fraud is different from extrinsic fraud because it cannot be used to collaterally attack a prior judgment. Extrinsic fraud involves affirmative misrepresentations or concealment of evidence that prevents a fair trial from taking place.

intoxication | inure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.