Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

intrinsic fraud

Read a random definition: Spam

A quick definition of intrinsic fraud:

Intrinsic fraud: This is when someone in a court case has a chance to stop their opponent from lying, but they don't do anything about it. It's different from when someone lies on purpose to trick the court, which is called extrinsic fraud. Intrinsic fraud can't be used to change a previous decision. A good example is when someone lies under oath (called perjury) and the other person doesn't try to prove it's a lie. If the lie helps the person win the case, and they don't do anything about it, they can't complain later if they lose.

A more thorough explanation:

Intrinsic fraud is a type of fraud that occurs during litigation when one party has the opportunity to protect themselves from their opponent's fraud but fails to do so. It is not an affirmative misrepresentation, unlike extrinsic fraud.

For example, perjury is a classic example of intrinsic fraud. When a witness lies under oath, they know that their false testimony is the only way to support their claim or defense. The trial is their chance to prove the truth, but they choose to lie instead. If they fail to prove their case and the judgment is affirmed on appeal, they cannot use intrinsic fraud to challenge the decision.

Another example of intrinsic fraud is when a party fails to disclose important evidence that could have affected the outcome of the case. If they had the opportunity to present the evidence but chose not to, they cannot later claim intrinsic fraud to challenge the judgment.

Intrinsic fraud is different from extrinsic fraud because it cannot be used to collaterally attack a prior judgment. Extrinsic fraud involves affirmative misrepresentations or concealment of evidence that prevents a fair trial from taking place.

intoxication | inure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.