Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

investigative detention

Read a random definition: bilateral mistake

A quick definition of investigative detention:

Investigative detention is when the police hold someone for questioning during an investigation of a crime, but without formally arresting them. This can only happen if the police have a good reason to suspect that the person was involved in the crime. It's important to remember that this kind of detention is only allowed if there is probable cause. This means that the police must have a good reason to believe that the person they are detaining was involved in the crime.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Investigative detention is the holding of a suspect without formal arrest during the investigation of their participation in a crime. This type of detention is constitutional only if there is probable cause.

Example: If the police suspect someone of committing a crime, they may detain them for questioning without formally arresting them. This is investigative detention. However, if they do not have probable cause, the detention would be unconstitutional.

Another example: In a juvenile delinquency case, the court may order the detention of a juvenile charged with a crime if they believe that releasing the juvenile would create a serious risk of them committing another crime before their probable-cause hearing. This is also an example of investigative detention.

These examples illustrate how investigative detention is used to hold suspects during the investigation of a crime, but only if there is probable cause. It is important to note that investigative detention is not the same as pretrial detention or preventive detention, which have different legal requirements and purposes.

investigating magistrate | investigative grand jury

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.