Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

irreconcilable differences

Read a random definition: market price

A quick definition of irreconcilable differences:

Term: Irreconcilable Differences

Definition: Irreconcilable differences is a term used in family law to describe a situation where a married couple cannot get along anymore and want to end their marriage. It is one of the reasons that can be given for a no-fault divorce. This means that the court does not need to know what the differences are, and it can be as simple as one person wanting a divorce and the other not. Both parties do not need to agree to a divorce based on irreconcilable differences.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Irreconcilable differences is a term used in family law to describe a situation where a married couple has differences that cannot be resolved, and these differences are so significant that they make it clear that the marriage should be ended. This term is often used as a reason for a no-fault divorce, where neither party is blamed for the breakdown of the marriage. Different states may use different terms, such as incompatibility or irretrievable breakdown.

Example: In California, the Family Code Section 2311 defines irreconcilable differences as substantial reasons for discontinuing a marriage. This means that if a couple has differences that cannot be resolved, and these differences are significant enough to make it clear that the marriage should end, then the court can grant a divorce based on irreconcilable differences.

Example: In the 1972 California case of In re Marriage of Walton, the court ruled that both parties do not need to agree to a divorce based on irreconcilable differences. This means that if one party wants a divorce and the other does not, the court can still grant a divorce based on irreconcilable differences. This example illustrates that irreconcilable differences can be used as a reason for divorce even if both parties do not agree.

IRC | irrelevant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.