Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

J.P. Stevens test

Read a random definition: qui sibi vigilavit

A quick definition of J.P. Stevens test:

Term: J.P. STEVENS TEST

Definition: The J.P. Stevens test is a way to determine if someone trying to get a patent did something wrong. It has two parts: first, they check if the person did something important and meant to do it. Then, they look at all the facts to decide if the person did something wrong. If they did something really bad, they might not get the patent.

A more thorough explanation:

The J.P. Stevens test is a two-part test used to determine whether a patent-applicant's conduct was unfair before the Patent and Trademark Office. The test involves:

  1. Determining whether the materiality and intent thresholds are met
  2. Deciding whether, on balance, the facts show unfair conduct as a matter of law

Information that is clearly important or conduct that is clearly deceptive can influence the outcome of the test.

For example, if a patent-applicant intentionally withholds important information from the Patent and Trademark Office, this could be considered unfair conduct and may result in the patent being denied.

The J.P. Stevens test is important in ensuring that patents are granted fairly and that patent-applicants are honest in their dealings with the Patent and Trademark Office.

JPO | judex

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.