Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

jocus partitus

Read a random definition: Smith Act

A quick definition of jocus partitus:

Term: jocus partitus

Definition: Jocus partitus is a historical term that refers to a gambling agreement made by people involved in a lawsuit. This means that they would bet on the outcome of the case, dividing the winnings between them. It was a way to add excitement to the legal process, but it is no longer allowed today.

A more thorough explanation:

jocus partitus

jocus partitus is a term used in history to describe a gambling agreement made by people involved in a lawsuit. This means that the parties involved in the lawsuit would make a bet on the outcome of the case.

For example, if two people were involved in a lawsuit, they might make a jocus partitus agreement where they would bet on who would win the case. If one person won the case, they would get the money that was bet.

Another example would be if two people were involved in a lawsuit over a piece of land. They might make a jocus partitus agreement where they would bet on who would get the land. If one person won the case, they would get the land and the money that was bet.

These examples illustrate how jocus partitus was used in history as a way for people to gamble on the outcome of a lawsuit.

job-targeting program | John-a-Nokes

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.