Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

joinder of issue

Read a random definition: public forum

A quick definition of joinder of issue:

Term: Joinder of issue

Definition: Joinder of issue is when both parties in a lawsuit agree that a particular issue is in dispute. This happens when the defendant challenges some or all of the plaintiff's allegations of fact or when it is known which legal questions are in dispute. It usually occurs after pretrial discovery is complete.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Joinder of issue is a legal term that refers to the point in a lawsuit when both parties have accepted that a particular issue is in dispute. This happens when the defendant challenges some or all of the plaintiff's allegations of fact or when it is known which legal questions are in dispute. It usually occurs when pretrial discovery is complete.

Example: In a personal injury case, the plaintiff may allege that the defendant was negligent and caused the accident that resulted in the plaintiff's injuries. The defendant may deny these allegations and argue that the plaintiff was actually at fault for the accident. Once both parties have presented their arguments and evidence, and it is clear that the issue of fault is in dispute, the issue is joined.

Explanation: In this example, the issue of fault is in dispute between the plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant was at fault, while the defendant denies this and argues that the plaintiff was at fault. Once both parties have presented their arguments and evidence, and it is clear that the issue of fault is in dispute, the issue is joined. This means that the parties have accepted that this particular issue is in dispute and will need to be resolved through further legal proceedings.

joinder | joint

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.