Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

joint

Read a random definition: statutory

A quick definition of joint:

A joint is something that is shared by two or more people or things. For example, when parents get divorced, they might have joint custody of their children, which means they both have legal or physical custody. Joint ownership means that two or more people own something together, like a house or a car. Joint liability means that two or more people are responsible for paying a debt or a fine. Joint tortfeasors are two or more people who are responsible for causing someone else to get hurt and have to pay for the damages together.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Held in common by two or more persons or things.

Some examples of the term "joint" in a legal sense include:

  • Joint custody: An arrangement in which both parents have legal or physical custody of a child or children after a divorce or separation.
  • Joint defendant: A defendant involved in a lawsuit with two or more defendants.
  • Joint liability: Liability that is shared by two or more defendants due to their shared responsibility for a debt, claim, or judgment.
  • Joint ownership: An arrangement in which each owner has an undivided interest in property, usually with a right of survivorship. For example, if two people own a house jointly and one person dies, the other person automatically becomes the sole owner of the house.
  • Joint tortfeasors: Two or more defendants whose negligence contributed to the plaintiff's injuries and are thus jointly liable for damages in the same lawsuit.

These examples illustrate the definition of "joint" because they all involve two or more people or things sharing something in common. In joint custody, both parents share custody of their child. In joint ownership, both owners share an interest in the property. In joint liability, multiple defendants share responsibility for a debt or claim. And in joint tortfeasors, multiple defendants share liability for the plaintiff's injuries.

joinder of issue | joint adventure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.