Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Judicial Conference of the United States

Read a random definition: praeter dotem

A quick definition of Judicial Conference of the United States:

The Judicial Conference of the United States is a group of important people who make decisions about how the federal courts work. They look at what the courts are doing and suggest changes to Congress. They also supervise the people who help the courts run smoothly. The group was created a long time ago in 1923 and used to be called the Conference of Senior Circuit Judges.

A more thorough explanation:

The Judicial Conference of the United States is a group of judges who make decisions about how the federal courts should work. They look at how the courts are doing and suggest changes to Congress. They also supervise the work of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

The Conference was first created in 1923 and was called the Conference of Senior Circuit Judges. It is an important group because it helps make sure that the federal courts are working well and that they are fair to everyone.

For example, if the Judicial Conference sees that there are too many cases in one court, they might suggest that Congress create a new court to help with the workload. Or if they see that a certain law is causing problems in the courts, they might suggest that Congress change the law to make it better.

judicial compensation | judicial confession

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.