Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

justiciability

Read a random definition: self-help remedy

A quick definition of justiciability:

Justiciability is about what kinds of cases a court can hear. If a case is "nonjusticiable," then the court cannot hear it. To be justiciable, the court must be deciding a real problem, the person bringing the case must have a good reason to do so, and the issue must be ready to be decided. The court will not hear a case if it is just giving advice, if the person bringing the case has not been harmed, if the issue is not ready to be decided, or if the issue is too political.

A more thorough explanation:

Overview: Justiciability refers to the types of cases that a court can hear and decide. If a case is "nonjusticiable," then the court cannot hear it. To be justiciable, the court must not be offering an advisory opinion, the plaintiff must have standing, and the issues must be ripe but neither moot nor violative of the political question doctrine. These issues are all up to the discretion of the court that is deciding the case.

Advisory Opinion: An advisory opinion is a court's nonbinding interpretation of a legal question. Federal courts can only decide actual controversies, as required by the Case and Controversy Clause of the Constitution. Some state courts can issue advisory opinions under limited circumstances, but these circumstances are usually specified in the state's constitution.

Standing: Standing refers to the ability of a plaintiff to bring a lawsuit in court. The plaintiff must have suffered an actual harm caused by the defendant, and the harm must be redressable. For example, if someone sues a company for selling a defective product that caused them harm, they have standing to bring the lawsuit.

Ripeness: A claim is ripe when the facts of the case have matured into an actual controversy. A case is not ripe if the harm to the plaintiff has not yet occurred. For example, if someone sues a company for a potential harm that may happen in the future, the case is not ripe because the harm has not yet occurred.

Mootness: A claim is moot if the relevant issues have already been resolved. For example, if someone sues a company for a harm that has already been fixed, the case is moot because there is no longer a controversy to decide.

Political Question Doctrine: Under the political question doctrine, a court will refuse to hear a case if the relevant issues are politically charged. For example, if someone sues the government over a political decision, the court may refuse to hear the case because it is a political question that should be decided by the elected officials, not the courts.

Example: John sues a company for selling him a defective product that caused him harm. John has standing to bring the lawsuit because he suffered an actual harm caused by the company. The case is ripe because the harm has already occurred, and it is not moot because the harm has not been resolved. The court can hear this case because it is justiciable.

justice system | justiciable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.