Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

federal courts

Read a random definition: defective title

A quick definition of federal courts:

Federal Courts are courts that have the power to hear certain types of cases that involve federal laws or the U.S. Constitution. There are three levels of federal courts: district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court. District courts are where trials take place and where facts are found. Appeals from district courts go to one of the 12 circuit courts, and if a party wants to appeal a circuit court decision, they can ask the Supreme Court to hear the case. There are also special courts that deal with specific types of cases, like copyright or bankruptcy issues.

A more thorough explanation:

Federal Courts are courts that have limited jurisdiction and the authority to hear cases that fall within the scope defined in Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and Congressional statutes. These cases include:

  • Cases involving a federal question
  • Cases involving diversity
  • Cases between two states

The federal court system is composed of three separate levels: district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court. District courts function as trial courts and act as the initial finders of fact. Appeals from District courts go to one of the 12 circuit courts, each of which serves a separate geographic area. A party wishing to appeal a circuit court decision can appeal for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court. If this writ is granted, the Supreme Court will hear the case. Additionally, the federal court system also has trial courts of special and exclusive jurisdiction that decide specific types of controversies such as copyright or bankruptcy issues.

For example, if a person believes their constitutional rights have been violated by a government agency, they can file a lawsuit in federal court. Another example is if a person from one state sues a person from another state for damages in excess of $75,000, they can file a lawsuit in federal court.

These examples illustrate how federal courts have the authority to hear cases that fall within their limited jurisdiction, as defined by the U.S. Constitution and Congressional statutes.

federal court | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.