Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

justifiable homicide

Read a random definition: jus fluminum

A quick definition of justifiable homicide:

Justifiable homicide is when someone takes another person's life, but it is considered legal and not a crime. This can happen in situations where the person acted in self-defense and had a reasonable fear of being killed or seriously hurt. It can also happen when the law permits the killing, such as in an execution for a serious crime. Justifiable homicide is different from when someone kills in the heat of the moment or because they were not thinking clearly, which may be seen as less serious.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Justifiable homicide is the act of taking a human life under certain circumstances that are considered justified or lawful. This can include self-defense or other causes set out in statute.

For example, in Virginia, a justifiable homicide in self-defense occurs when a person kills another without any fault on their part in provoking or bringing on the difficulty, and under reasonable apprehension of death or great bodily harm to themselves.

Another example of justifiable homicide is an execution for a capital crime, which is permitted by law. In these cases, the person who takes the life is absolved of any criminal liability.

It's important to note that justifiable homicides are not the same as homicides committed under the heat of passion or with diminished capacity. These may be considered mitigating circumstances that reduce the actor's culpability with regards to a killing.

Overall, justifiable homicide is a legal concept that allows for the taking of a human life under certain circumstances that are considered justified or lawful.

justiciable | justification

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.