Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

lack-of-antecedent-basis rejection

Read a random definition: common diligence

A quick definition of lack-of-antecedent-basis rejection:

Lack-of-antecedent-basis rejection is when a patent application is rejected because a reference in the specification or claim is missing. This means that something important is not included in the application, and it cannot be approved until it is fixed. It's like trying to build a puzzle without all the pieces - it won't work until everything is there.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Lack-of-antecedent-basis rejection is a refusal to accept a contractual offer or tendered goods as contractual performance. It can also refer to a patent examiner's finding that a claim in an application is unpatentable due to a missing reference in the specification or claim.

Examples:

  • A buyer rejects nonconforming goods within a reasonable time after delivery and notifies the seller. This is an example of lack-of-antecedent-basis rejection in a contractual context.
  • A patent examiner rejects a claim in a patent application because it lacks a reference in the specification or claim. This is an example of lack-of-antecedent-basis rejection in a patent context.

Both examples illustrate the concept of lack-of-antecedent-basis rejection, which is a refusal to accept something due to a missing reference or basis. In the contractual context, the buyer rejects the goods because they do not meet the agreed-upon specifications. In the patent context, the examiner rejects the claim because it lacks a reference that is necessary to support the claim.

Lackey claim | lack of capacity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
cumsock
15:38
It’s the 6th biggest city in the country there is plenty to do and eat and so on and so forth of course it has bad areas but so does every city
why would you withdraw girl
15:38
@ImpartialLion: nah cuz there’s no way of knowing if they would’ve sent u an II later on
15:38
Isn’t uchicago like Top 4 tho
choosingpeace
15:38
@cumsock: they said there's like nothing to do there lol
choosingpeace
15:38
ive never been so i was just like ohhh
texaslawhopefully
15:38
UChicago is number one
^ period
u know it was a double thing. I missed II and my gf didn't want to live in the midwest anymore
15:39
But it’s fucking uchicago thooo LOL
15:39
I
15:40
Makes sense tho
cumsock
15:40
@choosingpeace: there’s plenty to do in Philly 😂 it’s a giant city
So after missing the II, I was like whatever. Maybe it's a sign to withdraw
nah making decisions off the gf is out of pocket
nahhhhh we been together since 10th grade
texaslawhopefully
15:40
I guess it depends what your goals are. If it's generic biglaw, CLS will get you the same outcome
6 yrs on January 30th
lilypadfrog
15:40
awwww <3 i love love
I also like CLS for liberal clerking. approx 41 FCOA clerks per yr
It's there if I excel. if not then I'm chill with sticking to BL
texaslawhopefully
15:41
CLS is not even close to Chicago for clerking lmao
choosingpeace
15:41
wait would yall pick CLS or penn?
I didn't apply to either but I would pick penn
15:42
penn bc im in state
no no it's not. But I wouldn't clerk conservative, so idk about Chi #s for myself
cumsock
15:42
Penn
texaslawhopefully
15:42
I guess that's fair. From what I've heard UChicago for conservatives is on par w/ HYS for clerkships
texaslawhopefully
15:42
not sure about for liberals
cumsock
15:43
They’re very similar tho
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.