Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Landon v. Plasencia

Read a random definition: hereby

A quick definition of Landon v. Plasencia:

In Landon v. Plasencia, the Supreme Court decided that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) had the power to decide if a permanent resident alien could enter the United States, but that the alien had the right to due process. The Court said that Congress did not require the INS to use deportation hearings to decide if a permanent resident alien could enter the U.S. The Court also said that a permanent resident alien has constitutional rights, but the Court did not say what those rights are. The Court said that the role of the courts is to make sure that the INS follows the rules for due process, but the courts cannot tell the INS how to do its job.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A 1982 Supreme Court case that established that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has the power to determine if a permanent resident alien can enter the United States in an exclusion hearing, but that permanent resident aliens have the right to due process in these proceedings.

Example: In Landon v. Plasencia, the Supreme Court ruled that the INS had the authority to deny the entry of a permanent resident alien in an exclusion hearing, rather than a deportation hearing. The Court also established that permanent resident aliens have the right to due process in these proceedings, meaning they have the right to be notified of the charges against them and the right to present a defense.

Explanation: This case illustrates the balance between the government's power to regulate immigration and the rights of permanent resident aliens. The Court determined that the INS had the authority to determine admissibility in an exclusion hearing, but that permanent resident aliens have the right to due process in these proceedings. This means that they have the right to be treated fairly and given notice of the charges against them, even though they are not citizens of the United States.

landlord-tenant law | Lanham Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.