Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Lanham Act

Read a random definition: meaning

A quick definition of Lanham Act:

The Lanham Act is a law that helps people protect their trademarks. A trademark is a special name or symbol that a company uses to show that their products are different from others. To get protection under the Lanham Act, the trademark must be in use and unique. If someone else uses a similar trademark, it can cause confusion for customers and be against the law. The Lanham Act helps people take legal action against others who use their trademark without permission.

A more thorough explanation:

The Lanham Act is a law passed by the US Congress in 1946 that provides a national system for registering trademarks and protects the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of similar marks that may cause confusion among consumers or dilute the value of a famous mark.

For a mark to be eligible for trademark protection, it must be in use in commerce and distinctive. The Lanham Act defines a trademark as a mark used in commerce or registered with a bona fide intent to use it in commerce. If a mark is not in use in commerce at the time of registration, it may still be permitted if the applicant establishes a good faith intent to use the mark in commerce in the future. Exclusive rights to a trademark are awarded to the first to use it in commerce.

The second requirement, that a mark be distinctive, means that it must be able to identify and distinguish particular goods as coming from one producer or source and not another. Trademarks are divided into four categories of distinctiveness: arbitrary/fanciful, suggestive, descriptive, and generic. A mark that is categorized as either arbitrary/fanciful or suggestive is considered inherently distinctive, and exclusive rights to the mark are determined solely by priority of use. A trademark that is categorized as descriptive is only protectable as a trademark if it has acquired a secondary meaning in the minds of the consuming public. Generic terms are never eligible for trademark protection because they refer to a general class of products rather than indicating a unique source.

To establish a trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, the plaintiff must demonstrate that they have a valid and legally protectable mark, they own the mark, and the defendant's use of the mark to identify goods or services causes a likelihood of confusion. For example, if a company uses a logo that is similar to another company's logo and sells similar products, it may be considered a trademark violation if consumers are likely to confuse the two companies.

Landon v. Plasencia | Lapp test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.