Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Lanham Act

Read a random definition: exterritorial

A quick definition of Lanham Act:

The Lanham Act is a law that helps people protect their trademarks. A trademark is a special name or symbol that a company uses to show that their products are different from others. To get protection under the Lanham Act, the trademark must be in use and unique. If someone else uses a similar trademark, it can cause confusion for customers and be against the law. The Lanham Act helps people take legal action against others who use their trademark without permission.

A more thorough explanation:

The Lanham Act is a law passed by the US Congress in 1946 that provides a national system for registering trademarks and protects the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of similar marks that may cause confusion among consumers or dilute the value of a famous mark.

For a mark to be eligible for trademark protection, it must be in use in commerce and distinctive. The Lanham Act defines a trademark as a mark used in commerce or registered with a bona fide intent to use it in commerce. If a mark is not in use in commerce at the time of registration, it may still be permitted if the applicant establishes a good faith intent to use the mark in commerce in the future. Exclusive rights to a trademark are awarded to the first to use it in commerce.

The second requirement, that a mark be distinctive, means that it must be able to identify and distinguish particular goods as coming from one producer or source and not another. Trademarks are divided into four categories of distinctiveness: arbitrary/fanciful, suggestive, descriptive, and generic. A mark that is categorized as either arbitrary/fanciful or suggestive is considered inherently distinctive, and exclusive rights to the mark are determined solely by priority of use. A trademark that is categorized as descriptive is only protectable as a trademark if it has acquired a secondary meaning in the minds of the consuming public. Generic terms are never eligible for trademark protection because they refer to a general class of products rather than indicating a unique source.

To establish a trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, the plaintiff must demonstrate that they have a valid and legally protectable mark, they own the mark, and the defendant's use of the mark to identify goods or services causes a likelihood of confusion. For example, if a company uses a logo that is similar to another company's logo and sells similar products, it may be considered a trademark violation if consumers are likely to confuse the two companies.

Landon v. Plasencia | Lapp test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
voicemail box D:
good luck, you got it! as someone that has been through this process twice. It will all work out in the end :)
17:10
where’s BC i’m scared
17:16
Thicky plz do not get star spangled hammered tonite.
applied mid november and still nothing from BC
it's actually getting really annoying
MrThickRopes
17:46
2 Late llama
17:50
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: Sorry fren. Try to keep ur chin up and be patient (as tough as that sounds). Also, did you receive an LSAC conformation email ensuring your apps were sent?
17:51
@MrThickRopes: Try spicy water (sparkling water). It has all the pros of beer and none of the negatives.
Mostlylegal
17:54
I love sparkling water
17:55
@Mostlylegal: Gets it.
MrThickRopes
17:56
Na I’m drinking dat white claw
white claw should be considered spicy water
17:57
I heard Wyte Claws are outlawed on law school campuses since there are no laws when drinkin claws, hence they defeat the purpose of learning law, is that true?
17:58
They cancel out, like -1 * -1 = 1
MrThickRopes
18:06
na cause if you gonna break the law you gotta know the law so you know what laws to break
18:10
165+ scorer answer that is.
MrThickRopes
18:12
Yeah I got a 165. A 165 inch
babycakes
18:13
i had limoncello la croix today that shit was fire
MrThickRopes
18:18
low key whiteclaw don't taste good at all
B-I-N-G-O
18:18
prosecco+ sparking lemon water + limoncello is a great combo
18:23
wow, for one the chat is enriched with people of fine taste, colour me flabbergasted!
18:23
once*
MrThickRopes
18:23
but i'll still pound dem biches back
@llama: yea.. it says complete and all that on my status checker.. It says under review on my lawhub status checker too so i really don't know what they're thinking
MrThickRopes
18:35
just drink a few claws about it bruh
18:45
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmissions/comments/1jt3hdb/share_of_lsdata_users_that_have_heard_back_from/ Re 87% in that time frame have heard back (of LSD users). So figure 70% of BC applicants use LSD, I would say there is a decent chance you will hear back hopefully soon. IG from the school chat on here there was a recent R wave, so if that was not you, that is a plus
@llama thanks bro just tryna stay positive
in addition to formal LOCIs that I attach to emails, i can also send shorter emails closer to deposit deadlines to express my continued interest, right??
20:29
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: LOCIs every 4 weeks if you are wait listed is what I have been told. On schools you have not heard from, I have also heard you should not contact them. I disagree: admittance is a binary event [with infinite inputs like ur gpa, lsat, how the adcom is feeling that day, if they like u for whatever reason outside of your control] : you get in or you do not, so if by u emailing them a few times to express your continued interest/ if you have a question, I do not see the issue with that. However, someone else here may say otherwise. Take what I say with a micro grain tho lol
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.