Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Lanham Act

Read a random definition: disabled person

A quick definition of Lanham Act:

The Lanham Act is a law that helps people protect their trademarks. A trademark is a special name or symbol that a company uses to show that their products are different from others. To get protection under the Lanham Act, the trademark must be in use and unique. If someone else uses a similar trademark, it can cause confusion for customers and be against the law. The Lanham Act helps people take legal action against others who use their trademark without permission.

A more thorough explanation:

The Lanham Act is a law passed by the US Congress in 1946 that provides a national system for registering trademarks and protects the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of similar marks that may cause confusion among consumers or dilute the value of a famous mark.

For a mark to be eligible for trademark protection, it must be in use in commerce and distinctive. The Lanham Act defines a trademark as a mark used in commerce or registered with a bona fide intent to use it in commerce. If a mark is not in use in commerce at the time of registration, it may still be permitted if the applicant establishes a good faith intent to use the mark in commerce in the future. Exclusive rights to a trademark are awarded to the first to use it in commerce.

The second requirement, that a mark be distinctive, means that it must be able to identify and distinguish particular goods as coming from one producer or source and not another. Trademarks are divided into four categories of distinctiveness: arbitrary/fanciful, suggestive, descriptive, and generic. A mark that is categorized as either arbitrary/fanciful or suggestive is considered inherently distinctive, and exclusive rights to the mark are determined solely by priority of use. A trademark that is categorized as descriptive is only protectable as a trademark if it has acquired a secondary meaning in the minds of the consuming public. Generic terms are never eligible for trademark protection because they refer to a general class of products rather than indicating a unique source.

To establish a trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, the plaintiff must demonstrate that they have a valid and legally protectable mark, they own the mark, and the defendant's use of the mark to identify goods or services causes a likelihood of confusion. For example, if a company uses a logo that is similar to another company's logo and sells similar products, it may be considered a trademark violation if consumers are likely to confuse the two companies.

Landon v. Plasencia | Lapp test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Morning
10:37
Gecko, I feel pretty good. Two of the RC passages had really tough inference questions -- hoping I narrowed down my answer choices correctly
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.