Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

law in books

Read a random definition: E-Commerce Directive

A quick definition of law in books:

Law in books refers to the laws and legal rules that are written down in books and other official documents. These laws are often different from how they are actually used in real life situations, which is known as law in action. Some people criticize the way that legal scholars write about the law, saying that it doesn't accurately reflect how the law is really used.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Law in books refers to the laws and legal doctrines that are written down in books, such as legal reporters. This term is often used to contrast with "law in action," which refers to how laws are actually applied in real life. Scholars who study law in books often critique legal theories and doctrines, arguing that they do not accurately reflect how laws are used in practice.

One example of law in books is the United States Constitution. This document outlines the basic principles of the American legal system, but it does not necessarily reflect how those principles are applied in practice. For example, the Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, but there are many limitations on that right in practice.

Another example of law in books is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). This is a set of laws that govern commercial transactions in the United States. While the UCC provides a framework for how these transactions should be conducted, it does not necessarily reflect how they are actually conducted in practice.

These examples illustrate the concept of law in books because they show how legal doctrines and principles can be written down in books, but may not accurately reflect how they are applied in real life. Scholars who study law in books argue that it is important to understand both the theoretical principles of the law and how they are actually used in practice.

Law French | Law Latin

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.