Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

leading-object rule

Read a random definition: fraudulent concealment

A quick definition of leading-object rule:

The leading-object rule, also known as the main-purpose rule, is a legal principle that applies to contracts. It states that if someone promises to guarantee another person's debt, and the main reason for making that promise is to benefit themselves, then they don't have to put that promise in writing. This means that the promise is still legally binding, even if it wasn't written down.

A more thorough explanation:

The leading-object rule, also known as the main-purpose rule, is a doctrine in contract law. It states that if a promise to guarantee someone else's debt is made primarily for the promisor's own benefit, then the promise does not have to be in writing and the statute of frauds does not apply.

For example, if a business owner promises to pay a supplier's debt to ensure that the supplier continues to provide goods to the business, then the leading-object rule applies. The promise is made for the benefit of the business owner, as it ensures a continued supply of goods, rather than for the benefit of the supplier.

The leading-object rule is important because it allows certain promises to be enforceable even if they are not in writing. However, it only applies in specific circumstances where the primary purpose of the promise is for the promisor's own benefit.

L–CLAIM PROCEEDING | left-handed marriage

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 2 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.