Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

legal person

Read a random definition: avoidable

A quick definition of legal person:

A legal person is a term used in law to describe an entity, whether it is a human or non-human, that is treated as a person for certain legal purposes. This means that they can own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued. In business law, legal person is used to refer to corporations, partnerships, and other types of business organizations. In election law, legal personhood has been upheld for corporations that want to contribute to political campaigns.

A more thorough explanation:

A legal person is an entity, either human or non-human, that is recognized as a person for certain legal purposes. This means that they have some of the same rights and responsibilities as a human being, such as the ability to own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued.

  • Businesses: Corporations, partnerships, and limited liability companies are all examples of legal persons in the context of business law. This means that they can enter into contracts, own property, and be held liable for their actions.
  • Non-profit organizations: Non-profit organizations are also considered legal persons, which allows them to own property, enter into contracts, and receive donations.
  • Government entities: Government entities, such as cities or states, are also considered legal persons for certain legal purposes.

For example, if a corporation enters into a contract with another company, it is treated as a legal person and can be held liable if it breaches the contract. Similarly, if a non-profit organization owns a building, it is treated as a legal person and can be held liable if someone is injured on the property.

legal papers | legal realism

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
16:22
The reason why today’s Image-Fiction isn’t the rescue from a passive, addictive TV-psychology that it tries so hard to be is that most Image-Fiction writers render their material with the same tone of irony and self-consciousness that their ancestors, the literary insurgents of Beat and postmodernism, used so effectively to rebel against their own world and context. And the reason why this irreverent postmodern approach fails to help the new Imagists transfigure TV is simply that TV has beaten the new Imagists to the punch.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.