Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

legal realism

Read a random definition: feoffee

A quick definition of legal realism:

Legal realism is a way of thinking about how judges make decisions. It says that judges don't just follow the rules, but also think about what's best for society. This is different from another way of thinking called legal formalism. Both ways of thinking can be used to describe how judges make decisions or to say how they should make decisions.

A more thorough explanation:

Legal realism is a theory that suggests that all laws come from the current social interests and public policies. This means that judges don't just consider the rules, but also the social interests and public policies when making a decision. Legal realism is different from legal formalism, which only considers the rules.

For example, let's say there is a case where a person is suing a company for discrimination. A legal realist judge would consider not only the laws and rules related to discrimination but also the social interests and public policies related to discrimination. They might consider how the decision will affect the company's reputation and the public's perception of discrimination.

Another example could be a case where a person is suing a hospital for medical malpractice. A legal realist judge would consider not only the laws and rules related to medical malpractice but also the social interests and public policies related to healthcare. They might consider how the decision will affect the healthcare industry and the public's access to healthcare.

These examples illustrate how legal realism takes into account the broader social and policy implications of a legal decision, rather than just focusing on the rules and laws themselves.

legal person | legal research

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.