Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

lex Furia testamentaria

Read a random definition: baga

A quick definition of lex Furia testamentaria:

Lex Furia testamentaria was a law in ancient Rome that limited the amount of inheritance a person could leave in their will. It stated that no one could bequeath more than 1,000 copper coins or their equivalent. This law was passed between 204 and 169 B.C. and was one of the first to restrict legacies. If someone violated this law, they would have to pay a penalty of four times the amount, which could be recovered through a strict legal process. However, the law did allow a testator to leave nothing to their heir if they distributed their assets among other beneficiaries up to the limit.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Lex Furia testamentaria is a law in Roman law that restricts a testator from bequeathing more than 1,000 asses (722 pounds) of copper or its equivalent. This law was passed between 204 and 169 B.C. and was one of the first laws to limit legacies.

Example: The lex Furia testamentaria allowed a testator to leave nothing to their heir, as long as they made enough legatees up to the statutory limit of 1,000 asses. If a testator left more than 1,000 asses to someone who was not a close relative, that person would be penalized four times the amount and would have to pay it back through a strict legal process.

Explanation: This law was created to prevent wealthy individuals from leaving large sums of money to people who were not their close relatives. It was meant to ensure that wealth was distributed more evenly among family members and prevent the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals. The penalty for violating this law was severe, which shows how seriously the Romans took the issue of inheritance and legacy distribution.

lex Fufia Caninia | lex Fusia Caninia

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.