Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

lex Valeria Horatia

Read a random definition: to-have-and-to-hold clause

A quick definition of lex Valeria Horatia:

Term: LEX VALERIA HORATIA

Definition: The lex Valeria Horatia was a law in ancient Rome that made decisions made by the assembly of the people in tribes apply to all citizens. This law was passed in 449 B.C. and had different versions. One version aimed to make sure that decisions made by the plebeians were respected, while another version protected plebeian tribunes from harm.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Lex Valeria Horatia is a law in Roman law that makes the enactments by the assembly of the people in tribes binding on all citizens. Several laws of this name were passed in 449 B.C. One was aimed at strengthening the force of plebiscita. Another protected plebeian tribunes with sacrosanctity.

Examples: One example of the Lex Valeria Horatia is a law that protected plebeian tribunes with sacrosanctity. This means that the tribunes were considered sacred and could not be harmed or arrested while in office. Another example is a law that aimed at strengthening the force of plebiscita, which were resolutions passed by the plebeian assembly.

Explanation: The examples illustrate how the Lex Valeria Horatia was used to protect the rights of plebeians in ancient Rome. By making the enactments of the assembly binding on all citizens, the law ensured that the voices of the plebeians were heard and their interests were protected. The law also provided specific protections for plebeian tribunes, who were elected officials that represented the interests of the plebeians.

lex Theodosiana | lex validitatis

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:23
Small ahh wave
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:23
yeah the smallness of this wave makes me think there might be more to come? am i being crazy? only one wave a month it should be a tsunami rn
14:24
@jackfrost11770: chillll it still early in the cycle, especially relative to this and last yearrrr
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.