Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

libel per quod

Read a random definition: in misericordia

A quick definition of libel per quod:

Libel is when someone says or writes something bad about another person that is not true. It can be in writing, pictures, or even on the internet. Libel is a type of defamation, which means hurting someone's reputation. There are different types of libel, like group libel, which is when a whole group of people is defamed, and libel per se, which is when the statement is obviously bad. Some types of libel can only be punished if the person who was hurt can prove that they lost money or something else because of it. Libel used to be a crime, but now it is mostly a civil matter.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Libel per quod is a type of libel that is only actionable if special damages are alleged and proven. It can also refer to a type of libel where the defamatory meaning is not apparent on the face of the statement but must be proved from extrinsic circumstances.

Examples:

  • Example 1: A newspaper publishes an article stating that a local business owner has been accused of embezzlement. If the business owner can prove that they lost customers or revenue as a result of the article, they may have a case for libel per quod.
  • Example 2: A blogger writes a post about a celebrity, using coded language that implies the celebrity is a drug addict. The post itself does not explicitly state this, but the blogger's readers understand the implication. This could be considered libel per quod.

These examples illustrate how libel per quod can be more difficult to prove than other types of libel, as it requires the plaintiff to show specific damages or prove the defamatory meaning through extrinsic evidence.

lex marityma | liege homage

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
15:40
I guess it depends what your goals are. If it's generic biglaw, CLS will get you the same outcome
6 yrs on January 30th
lilypadfrog
15:40
awwww <3 i love love
I also like CLS for liberal clerking. approx 41 FCOA clerks per yr
It's there if I excel. if not then I'm chill with sticking to BL
texaslawhopefully
15:41
CLS is not even close to Chicago for clerking lmao
choosingpeace
15:41
wait would yall pick CLS or penn?
I didn't apply to either but I would pick penn
15:42
penn bc im in state
no no it's not. But I wouldn't clerk conservative, so idk about Chi #s for myself
cumsock
15:42
Penn
texaslawhopefully
15:42
I guess that's fair. From what I've heard UChicago for conservatives is on par w/ HYS for clerkships
texaslawhopefully
15:42
not sure about for liberals
cumsock
15:43
They’re very similar tho
cumsock
15:43
Both t6 ivies
Is that NYU disrespect???? NYU out the t-6?
15:44
Penn because my college friends who mentored me go there
lilypadfrog
15:45
NYU is a t6 unless they don’t accept me and then idgaf what they’re ranked
texaslawhopefully
15:46
That's the best mentality
texaslawhopefully
15:46
If I get into UChicago it will be CYS
lilypadfrog
15:48
waspy I’m sure he meant to clarify that CYS is Cornell Yale Stanford
yeah just making sure
I look really good in blue tho
obviously cornell is t3
cumsock
15:49
someone from my undergrad is going to columbia for a masters in social work and the way they are talking to me im pretty sure they think thats as hard to get accepted to as columbia law
every prof at cornell glazes it so hard
GreyCeaselessMammoth
15:50
i know so many heads going to various schools for random masters degrees and its like babe its not the sameeee
cumsock
15:50
"The acceptance rate for the Master of Science in Social Work (MSW) program at Columbia University is 74%" does he know?
15:50
@cumsock: some battles are won by avoiding fighting them
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.