Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

extrinsic evidence

Read a random definition: arbitration and award

A quick definition of extrinsic evidence:

Extrinsic evidence is information that relates to a contract but is not written in the contract itself. It comes from other sources, like conversations between the parties, the circumstances surrounding the agreement, and the parties' subsequent actions. If a contract is clear and easy to understand, extrinsic evidence is not needed. However, if there is confusion or disagreement about what the contract means, a court may look at extrinsic evidence to help interpret it. The parol evidence rule generally prevents extrinsic evidence from being used to contradict or change the terms of a written contract, but it may be allowed in certain situations.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Extrinsic evidence is information that relates to a contract but is not included in the written agreement. This evidence comes from other sources, such as statements made by the parties, circumstances surrounding the agreement, and general trade practices. It helps to provide context to the transaction between the parties.

Extrinsic evidence is used to interpret a contract when there is ambiguity or a gap in the written agreement. However, if a contract is unambiguous, no extrinsic evidence is needed. The parol evidence rule prohibits the use of extrinsic evidence that contradicts or varies a term in a writing that the parties intended to be completely integrated.

For example, if two parties sign a contract to sell a car for $10,000, but one party claims that they agreed to sell the car for $9,000, the parol evidence rule would prevent the use of any extrinsic evidence that supports the $9,000 price.

However, if there is ambiguity in the contract, extrinsic evidence can be used to interpret the agreement. For example, if a contract states that a seller will deliver "widgets" to a buyer, but does not specify the quantity or type of widgets, extrinsic evidence such as prior conversations between the parties or industry standards can be used to determine the intended meaning of "widgets."

Overall, extrinsic evidence helps to provide context and clarity to a contract when needed.

extreme cruelty | extrinsic fraud

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.