Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

libel per se

Read a random definition: American Inventors Protection Act

A quick definition of libel per se:

Libel per se is when someone says something about another person that is so damaging that it can be considered defamation on its own. This means that the words themselves are harmful and do not need any additional proof to show that they are defamatory. Examples of libel per se include false claims that someone committed a serious crime or has a contagious disease. In a libel per se case, the person making the statement is presumed to have acted with malice, and the person who was harmed can recover damages without having to prove that they suffered any specific harm. However, if the statement is just a matter of personal opinion, it may not be considered libel per se.

A more thorough explanation:

Libel per se is a type of defamatory statement that is considered harmful on its own and can be legally pursued without the need to prove specific damages. In order to be considered libel per se, the statement must be damaging to the person it is directed towards. If the statement can be interpreted in a different way, it may not be considered libel per se.

Examples of libel per se include:

  • False accusations of committing a crime of moral turpitude
  • Claims that a person has a "loathsome disease"

In these examples, the statements themselves are damaging and can harm a person's reputation or livelihood. Malice is presumed in cases of libel per se, meaning that the person making the statement is assumed to have intended to cause harm. Damages can be recovered without the need to prove specific harm.

However, it is important to note that statements of personal opinion are not considered libel per se. For example, negative reviews of a product or service are generally considered personal opinion and are not actionable as libel per se.

In summary, libel per se is a type of defamatory statement that is considered harmful on its own and can be legally pursued without the need to prove specific damages. Examples include false accusations of committing a crime or claims of having a "loathsome disease." Statements of personal opinion are not considered libel per se.

libel | liberty

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 1 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.