Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

life estate pur autre vie

Read a random definition: customer's man

A quick definition of life estate pur autre vie :

A life estate pur autre vie is a type of ownership where a person has the right to use and enjoy a property for as long as another person is alive. This means that the duration of the life estate is based on the life of someone else, not the owner of the life estate. For example, if a mother grants a life estate pur autre vie to her son, the son can use the property for as long as his father is alive. Once the father passes away, the life estate ends and the property reverts back to the mother or her heirs.

A more thorough explanation:

A life estate pur autre vie is a type of life estate that is measured using the life of another person. This means that the person who holds the life estate has the right to use and enjoy the property for the duration of the other person's life.

For example, John owns a house and grants a life estate pur autre vie to his sister, Jane, using the life of their mother as the measuring life. This means that Jane has the right to use and enjoy the house for as long as their mother is alive. If their mother passes away, the life estate ends and the property reverts back to John.

Another example is if a landlord grants a life estate pur autre vie to a tenant using the life of the tenant's spouse as the measuring life. This means that the tenant has the right to live in the rental property for as long as their spouse is alive.

These examples illustrate how a life estate pur autre vie can be used to provide someone with the right to use and enjoy a property for a specific period of time, based on the life of another person.

life estate | life expectancy

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.