Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

life expectancy

Read a random definition: disability compensation

A quick definition of life expectancy:

Life expectancy is how long someone is expected to live based on different factors like age, health, where they come from, how much money they have, and if they are a boy or a girl. This is important for things like figuring out how much money someone should get if they are hurt, how much money someone should get from their retirement savings, and how much someone should pay for life insurance.

A more thorough explanation:

Life Expectancy

Life expectancy is an estimate of how long a person is expected to live based on various factors such as age, health, gender, wealth, and origin. It is often calculated using actuarial tables. Life expectancy is used in many legal situations, including determining life estates, calculating damages for torts, and regulating retirement distributions. Life expectancy is also important for life insurance companies when calculating costs.

Example 1: A 65-year-old man who is in good health and has a family history of longevity may have a life expectancy of 20 more years. This means he is expected to live until he is 85 years old.

Example 2: A woman who has a chronic illness and is a heavy smoker may have a life expectancy of only 10 more years. This means she is expected to live until she is 60 years old.

These examples illustrate how life expectancy is calculated based on various factors such as age, health, and lifestyle choices. It is important to note that life expectancy is an estimate and not a guarantee of how long a person will live.

life estate pur autre vie | life insurance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.