Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Lilly Ledbetter

Read a random definition: institutional lender

A quick definition of Lilly Ledbetter:

Lilly Ledbetter is a woman who worked for a company called Goodyear. She thought she was being paid less than her male coworkers because she was a woman. She complained to the people who make sure everyone is treated fairly at work, but they didn't help her. She went to court, but the court said she waited too long to complain. Later, the government made a new law called the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act that says people like Lilly can still go to court even if they didn't complain right away. This law only helps people who are paid unfairly, not people who are treated unfairly in other ways at work.

A more thorough explanation:

Lilly Ledbetter is a woman who worked for Goodyear at its Gadsden, Alabama, plant from 1979 until 1998. She sued her employer under Title VII, alleging pay discrimination on the basis of her gender. She claimed that she consistently received poor reviews from her supervisors, and as a result, she was denied salary raises.

However, the Supreme Court held that anyone bringing a Title VII action must have first filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days (300 days in some jurisdictions) following the alleged discriminatory decision, and that each paycheck issued as a result of those decisions did not extend or restart the limitation period. The Court explained that because Ledbetter had not brought a complaint within the 180-period following the relevant pay decisions, the lawsuit was untimely.

Congress overruled this decision with the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. This legislation loosened the stringent standard set in the Ledbetter case by stating that each paycheck resulting from a discriminatory decision "restarts the clock" for the statute of limitations purposes. In other words, the statute of limitations for a discriminatory compensation case begins to run on the last day an employee receives compensation associated with any discriminatory decision or practice.

For example, if an employee is paid less than their male colleague for the same job, and this pay discrimination continues for several years, the statute of limitations for filing a complaint would not start until the last day the employee receives discriminatory pay. This act was passed out of recognition that employees often do not realize that they are receiving discriminatory pay until well after the 180-day statute of limitations has passed.

It is important to note that this act only applies to claims related to discriminatory compensation and other practices affecting compensation. It does not extend the time for filing claims related to other discrete discriminatory acts, such as hiring and termination.

Overall, Lilly Ledbetter's case and the subsequent legislation named after her have helped to address pay discrimination and ensure that employees have more time to file complaints if they believe they are being paid unfairly.

likelihood of confusion | Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.