Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

limited equity housing

Read a random definition: Realization of gain

A quick definition of limited equity housing:

A limited equity housing is a special type of housing where people can share ownership of a building with other families. It is managed by a nonprofit cooperative corporation and is designed to be affordable for low-income families. When someone wants to sell their share of the building, they can only make a limited amount of money to keep the price affordable for others. This type of housing was created by the government to help low-income families have a place to live.

A more thorough explanation:

Limited equity housing (LEHCs) is a type of housing arrangement managed by a nonprofit cooperative corporation. It is designed to provide affordable housing to low-income families.

LEHCs were introduced in the mid-20th century in the United States when the government converted wartime housing into residential complexes for low-income families.

In a LEHC, residents share ownership of a building with multiple families. To maintain affordability, the co-op takes out a blanket mortgage covering the entire property and allows residents to buy shares. The amount of equity that a member can earn upon resale of the unit is limited to preserve its affordable price.

For example, if a resident buys a share in a LEHC for $10,000 and sells it for $15,000, they may only be able to keep a portion of the profit, as determined by the co-op's rules. This ensures that the unit remains affordable for future low-income residents.

LEHCs are beneficial for low-income families who cannot afford to buy a home on their own. They provide a way for families to build equity and invest in their future while still maintaining affordable housing.

limitation of actions | limited jurisdiction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.