Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

literae mortuae

Read a random definition: in the course of employment

A quick definition of literae mortuae:

Term: LITERAE MORTUAE

Definition: Literae mortuae is a Latin term that refers to words in a legal document that have no meaning or purpose. They are often referred to as "dead letters" because they do not contribute to the overall meaning of the document. Think of them as filler words that are included in a statute or law, but do not have any real significance.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Literae mortuae (pronounced lit-uh-ree mor-choo-ee) is a Latin term that refers to dead letters or filler words in a statute.

Examples: An example of literae mortuae would be words like "the," "and," or "of" in a legal document. These words don't add any significant meaning to the document, but they are necessary for the sentence to make sense grammatically.

Another example would be the phrase "herein provided" in a statute. This phrase is often used to refer to a specific section of the statute, but it doesn't add any new information to the document.

Explanation: Literae mortuae are words that are necessary for a sentence to make sense grammatically, but they don't add any significant meaning to the document. These words are often used in legal documents, such as statutes, to clarify the meaning of the text. However, they can also make the document longer and more difficult to read. Understanding the concept of literae mortuae can help readers identify which words are essential to the meaning of a document and which words can be ignored.

literacy test | literae patentes

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.