Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

literal infringement

Read a random definition: bad-boy provision

A quick definition of literal infringement:

Literal infringement is when someone copies or uses something that belongs to someone else without their permission in a way that is exactly the same as what the owner has the right to. This can happen with things like patents, copyrights, and trademarks. It's like taking someone's toy without asking and playing with it in the exact same way they do. It's not okay to do this and can get you in trouble.

A more thorough explanation:

Literal infringement is a type of infringement that occurs when every element and limitation of a patent claim is present exactly in the accused product or process. This means that the accused product or process is identical to what is described in the patent claim.

For example, if a patent claim describes a widget with a specific shape, size, and material, and someone creates a widget that matches that description exactly, they are committing literal infringement.

Literal infringement is different from nonliteral infringement, which occurs when an accused product or process does not match the exact language of the patent claim, but is still similar enough to be considered an infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.

It's important to note that literal infringement is just one type of infringement, and there are other types of infringement that can occur in intellectual property law, such as trademark infringement and copyright infringement.

litera legis | literal interpretation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.