Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

lost property

Read a random definition: AIH

A quick definition of lost property:

Lost property is something that belongs to someone but they accidentally left it somewhere. For example, if someone drops their wallet and doesn't realize it, that's lost property. In the past, if someone found lost property, they could keep it unless the owner came forward. But now, there are rules that say lost property should be given to a government official and if no one claims it, the finder can keep it.

A more thorough explanation:

Lost property refers to personal belongings that an owner unintentionally and involuntarily loses or misplaces. This can include items such as wallets, phones, or keys.

According to common law, lost property is defined as personal property that was unintentionally left by its true owner. For example, if someone drops their wallet and doesn't realize it, that wallet is considered lost property. In the past, if someone found lost property, they were allowed to keep it until the original owner came forward.

Today, many jurisdictions have laws that modify the common law's treatment of lost property. These laws require lost personal property to be turned over to a government official, and if the property is not claimed within a set period of time, it goes to the finder. This means that the original owner's rights to the property are terminated.

Examples of lost property include:

  • A phone left on a park bench
  • A backpack forgotten on a bus
  • A set of keys dropped on the sidewalk

These examples illustrate how lost property can be unintentionally left behind by its owner and can be found by someone else. If the owner doesn't come forward to claim the lost property, the finder may be allowed to keep it.

loss of use | Louisiana

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
lilypadfrog
8:12
hi shawties
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.