Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

LRE

Read a random definition: extraordinary grand jury

A quick definition of LRE:

Term: LRE

Definition: LRE stands for "least restrictive environment." This means that students with disabilities should be educated in a setting that allows them to participate in the same activities and programs as their non-disabled peers as much as possible. This helps them to learn and grow alongside their peers and promotes inclusion and equality.

A more thorough explanation:

LRE

LRE stands for "least restrictive environment." This means that students with disabilities should be educated in a setting that allows them to participate in the same activities and programs as their non-disabled peers to the greatest extent possible.

For example, if a student with a disability can participate in a regular classroom with some accommodations, that would be considered the least restrictive environment. However, if the student needs more support, they may be placed in a special education classroom or receive additional services outside of the regular classroom.

Another example would be if a student with a physical disability wants to participate in a school sport. The school should make accommodations to allow the student to participate to the greatest extent possible, such as providing adaptive equipment or modifying the rules of the game if necessary.

The examples illustrate the concept of LRE by showing that students with disabilities should be included in the same activities and programs as their non-disabled peers whenever possible. This helps to promote their social and academic development and allows them to feel like they are part of the school community. By providing accommodations and support, schools can create a least restrictive environment that meets the needs of all students.

lower court | LULAC

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.