Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

MACRS

Read a random definition: remote

A quick definition of MACRS:

MACRS: A system used in the United States to calculate how much an asset has lost value over time for tax purposes. It helps individuals and businesses deduct more money from their taxes at the beginning of an asset's life, and less later on. This system replaced an older one in 1986 and applies to property placed into service after that year.

A more thorough explanation:

MACRS stands for modified accelerated cost recovery system. It is a tax depreciation system used in the United States to calculate asset depreciation. This system replaced the Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS) in 1986 and applies to property placed into service after 1986.

MACRS depreciation allows the capitalized cost of an asset to be recovered over a period, specified in the Internal Revenue Code, via annual deductions. This means that individuals and businesses can deduct a portion of the cost of an asset each year for tax purposes.

MACRS allows for greater accelerated depreciation over longer time periods, which is beneficial to individuals and businesses as it allows them to deduct greater amounts at the beginning of an asset’s life, and relatively less later on. For example, a business may purchase a new piece of equipment for $10,000. Under MACRS, they may be able to deduct $2,000 in the first year, $3,200 in the second year, $1,920 in the third year, and so on.

Overall, MACRS is a tax benefit that allows individuals and businesses to recover the cost of an asset over time, reducing their taxable income and potentially lowering their tax liability.

M.O. | magistrate

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.